Duggan did not fire on the Police.

A traditional blue lamp as seen outside most p...

Image via Wikipedia

Link to BBC Reporting cited at the end of this piece. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14449675 

Sunday 7-8-11, 7:35pm The Guardian’s crime correspondent, Sandra Laville, reports:

“The bullet which was found lodged in the radio of one of the officers at the scene is still undergoing forensic tests. But reliable sources have said the first ballistics examinations suggested it was a police issue bullet.

These are quite distinct as the Metropolitan Police uses dum dum type hollowed out bullets designed not to pass through an object.”

There appears to be a consensus that the firearm being carried in the minicab was a lethal weapon. A handgun which had at one time been a replica, a starting pistol or a collector’s weapon. But the firearm had been to fire live ammunition. Though reporting appears to concentrate on ‘ballistics experts’ who are not named, nor the authority of their claims supported by identified expertise.

One point of concern for me is that various reporting has indicated that Mark Duggan was in possession of the converted replica fire arm, yet none of the official reporting has, saying only that a firearm was recovered at the scene.

The IPCC hoped to have the results of more complete ballistics tests within 24 hours from the time of this report which was as indicated above about 7.30 pm Sunday evening. Establishing the trajectories of bullets and how many were fired.

According to Sky news the C019 firearms officer has said that he never claimed Duggan had shot at him but that he fired because he believed he was in danger from a lethal weapon. It is reported that two shots were fired, ; one hit Duggan and one missed, lodging in another officer’s radio.

This story was re-reported by Channel four news. Who subsequently on Monday 8-8-2011
reported that: A spokesperson for the IPCC had said that the ballistics report is expected within the next 24 hours. She would not divulge any of the findings of the initial ballistics tests. This deadline has also past without any information regarding the results of these tests.

The inquest into the death of Duggan opened Today and was almost immediately adjourned until 12-12-11 when a pre inquest hearing will be held, the only information that appears to have been confirmed at this short hearing was that Mr Duggan died of a single gunshot wound to the chest.

So now we are almost 48 hours from the time that the results of Forensic tests were expected to be known in 24 hours.

I really don’t have a particular agenda about this, so I genuinely do not have an opinion as to why this is, only a series of possible scenarios.

First: the reporting was a little too eager to establish a deadline.

Second: The Police offered a deadline they were unable to keep.

Third: the reporting indicated a deadline where none existed.

Fourth: The forensics results have not returned what the IPCC expected or hoped for.

Fifth: The results of the tests have been determined to be too inflammatory of a difficult situation to be published at this time. (Ie they show that both bullets were police issue.)

All in all it seems to me that a complex situation where truth is already somewhat muddied, is only getting muddier.

BBC reporting suggests the matter is now resolved.

The Independent Police Complaints commission says ballistic test results so far show no evidence that a handgun found at the scene of the fatal police shooting of Mark Duggan had been fired. It says the Forensic Science Service is carrying out further tests to confirm this.

The IPCC says the Forensic Science Service has also confirmed that the bullet lodged in a police radio was police issue and consistent with being fired from a police gun.

Duggan did not fire, so the question arises did he even have the gun in his possession?


About Transremaxculver

An entirely fictitious username I created for posting on 'alt.religion.scientology', Scientology is something of which I am highly critical. For those of you who don't know, the Church of Scientology have a habit of making life very uncomfortable for even the most legitimate of critics, which is why this username is completely anonymous. Anyway I have become quite fond of this username, and although it has to some extent outgrown it's original purpose, I think a blog is perhaps the right place for me/it to continue to grow and develop.
This entry was posted in London Riots, Miscellaneous, UK Riots and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Duggan did not fire on the Police.

  1. Pingback: Erneut hunderte gewaltbereite Jugendliche unterwegs | Der volkskorrekte Beobachter des Deutschen Volks

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s